The definition of artificial intelligence is a highly controversial bleeding edge proof regarding the nature and structure of true artificial intelligence. Formulated in such a way that it applies to all sets under all circumstances where individual actors have self-determination. This is the end result of the collective efforts of Steve Ballmer, Vernor Vinge, Tom Evans and Steve Wozniak, who have all been instrumental in the support of the author throughout his life the best that they possibly could, and while often ostensibly insignificant, underscores the formulation this author has made.

Contents 1 About 2 Introduction 3 Thesis 4 Formalizations

AboutEdit

This article is on Wikipedia not to act as a basis in fact but to provide a foundation in reason to inspire and promote the expert analysis required to achieve consensus on one of the most important matters the human history, what needs to be done to bring about true artificial intelligence. The author, and founders, of this theory challenge the expert moderators in their fields to understand the sheer profoundness of what this formulation attempts, and to apply the spirit and rigor that only the organization known as Wikipedia can achieve under the ever more urgency of the situation facing humanity today. To say this work is original in nature is obviously true, but what the text of Wikipedia’s rules actually classifies this as something else entirely.

“This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. All material added to articles on Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable published source, even if not actually attributed in the text. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions, experiences, arguments, or conclusions.” – No Original Research

While the sheer audacity of the author to present this theory as fact, in no uncertain terms may detract from its immediate credibility, those with a deep understanding of their fields will understand the importance of rapid application of real peer review to this formulation. There is a distinct difference between spam and something that is truly productive.

Once a solution is accepted by a party the implications that has on their decisions become more and more self-evident, as Dr. Stephen Merrill, Professor of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science at Marquette University often says “The solution is obvious” and “we are gods”. A person with no understanding of anything this article states for example could apply their Wikipedia skills to better manage the informal, by Wikipedia standards, nature of the citations and linkage surrounding this article, which would have a great benefit in the communication of this theory to the expert moderators who have neither the time nor inclination to participate in that manner. To be effective all interested parties must participate responsibly and defer to expert judgment when the individual does not believe they can play the role of effective moderation.

This work simply attempts to unify the underlying theory exposed by the greatest minds of any generation, in order to do so requires a definable goal, a true historical understanding of the situation, a true understanding of the current position and a true understanding of the position any action would manifest. Only then is the necessary direction needed obvious to all those in the knowledge of the solution. The influential BBC Show Doctor Who espouses this abstractly with the personification of the Time Lord mentality, and use that same mentality to achieve one of the longest running TV shows in history thus far.

IntroductionEdit

Much analysis in economics has focused on applying modeling to reality. It is near universally accepted that there are three primary market structures in the societal-ecosystem, Free Market (Adam Smith), Oligopoly (John Nash) and Monopoly. What has not been adequately studied is the role that these markets play in large scale organizations, and using them together to optimize the system with the goal of eliminating market failure.

ThesisEdit

In the unwavering and literal terms of set theory, economic theory and information theory; for all sets, under all conditions where the actors have self-determination the author poses:

Artificial Intelligence = Finite interaction is optimized through oligopical competition, whereas non-finite processes are optimized by the free market. Formal organizational group structure therefore must be oligopical, but their interaction must be free. The individual is a monopoly. Q.E.D.

Or in the simple yet elegant construct of the English Language: “To truly understand and use the system one must become the system.” – Jason L. Lind, President/Chief Software Architect of Lind Innovation

If correct this has obvious profound, and often counter-intuitive, implications. It is now public domain and requires the application of formal, and informal, peer review processes to determine the validity of this statement.

FormalizationsEdit

The formulation requires an advanced and deep understanding of the terminology of set theory, information theory and economic theory. To understand the major terms use the author has quoted from the giants of the required fields who, the author contends, had a much better understanding of their work than anyone in history.

Architecture, Artificial Intelligence, Equals, Finite versus Non-Finite Sets, Interaction, Optimization, Oligopoly, Competition, Process, Free market, Group, Organization, Structure, Free, Individual and Monopoly, Q.E.D.